This interactive workbook contains multiple workflow tabs. Use the tab navigation above to switch between sections, or use the sidebar navigation to jump to specific content.
Inclusive and Accessible Learning and Teaching with Generative AI
This workbook is designed for HE teaching staff who want to use Generative AI to create, adapt, and review teaching materials in ways that are inclusive, accessible, and practical across disciplines.
It introduces the UDL framework, explores what an inclusive university environment looks like for students, and shows how GenAI can help staff build better materials from the outset rather than retrofit them later.
You can work directly in Copilot or another approved AI tool while using the workbook.
Use GenAI to remove barriers, not add them.
The key question for learning and teaching is not whether AI can generate content quickly. It is whether that content helps more students participate, understand, and demonstrate learning in equitable ways.
Academic judgement remains essential. GenAI can suggest, scaffold, summarise, and transform content, but staff remain responsible for accuracy, ethics, accessibility, and pedagogic fit.
Activity: Basic UDL-Focused Prompting
Design for the Margins
A strong prompt tells the AI what you are trying to teach, who the learners are, what barriers you want to reduce, and what form the output should take.
This table describes practical prompt 'ingredients' for GenAI to create inclusive and accessible teaching materials.
Prompt ingredient
What to specify
Example
Useful for
Audience
Who the material is for, including level and likely prior knowledge
"First-year students encountering theory-heavy reading for the first time"
Making explanations and examples more appropriately pitched
Teaching purpose
What the material is meant to do in the learning sequence
"This is a pre-seminar guide intended to prepare students for discussion"
Aligning outputs with learning design rather than generic content generation
Barriers to reduce
Which access, comprehension, or participation barriers to address
"Reduce jargon load, add structure, and provide an alternative to a dense PDF"
Embedding inclusion and accessibility from the first draft
Output format
What form the response should take
"Produce slide text, speaker notes, alt text, and a 150-word student summary"
Generating reusable materials across different teaching formats
Quality criteria
State expectations such as readability, tone, accessibility, or alignment with policy
"Use plain language, clear headings, and include a short glossary for unfamiliar terms"
Improving consistency and accessibility in AI outputs
The UDL Prompt Pattern
Use this structure to ensure your AI outputs support inclusive design:
Context: I'm teaching [subject] to [student level] students with diverse learning needs.
UDL Goal: Create content that provides [specific UDL principle - engagement/representation/expression]
Content: [Your original content]
Request: Please [specific transformation needed]
Accessibility Note: Ensure the output is accessible to students who may [specific considerations]
Example:
Context: I'm teaching cellular biology to first-year undergraduates with diverse learning needs.
UDL Goal: Create content that provides multiple means of representation
Content: "Mitosis involves chromosome replication and nuclear division"
Request: Please create 3 alternative explanations: one using everyday analogies, one as a step-by-step process, and one focusing on the biological significance
Accessibility Note: Ensure explanations avoid metaphors that require specific cultural knowledge
⚠️ Important Limitations to Consider
They may reproduce biases from their training data, including racial, gender, cultural, and ableist biases
They cannot know your students : you provide that contextual knowledge
They may produce culturally homogenised content that centres Western norms by default
They may hallucinate facts, names, or references, especially in less-documented areas
They raise data privacy concerns : never input identifiable student data or confidential university content
🔍 Accessibility Audit & Creation
Learn how to audit existing teaching materials for accessibility barriers and create new content that is accessible from the start.
Why design for inclusion from the start?
From retrofit to inclusive-by-design practice
Many teaching materials become inaccessible because accessibility is treated as a final compliance check rather than a design principle. GenAI can help staff build alternative explanations, clearer structure, multiple formats, and plain-language supports earlier in the process.
Inclusive design is more efficient when it is built into the first draft. GenAI is useful when it helps you generate options, not just speed.
Before creating new materials, it's valuable to understand what barriers already exist in your teaching content. GenAI can help you systematically review your materials through an accessibility lens.
Activity: Accessibility Audit
Audit Your Existing Content
Use this prompt structure to review any existing teaching material:
Please review the following teaching material for accessibility barriers. Consider these specific areas:
Language & Structure:
- Complex vocabulary that could be simplified
- Long paragraphs that could be broken up
- Missing headings or unclear organisation
Visual Design:
- Information conveyed only through colour
- Missing alt text descriptions
- Poor contrast or formatting issues
Learning Support:
- Missing context or background information
- Unclear instructions or expectations
- Limited ways to engage with content
Content: [UPLOAD OR PASTE YOUR TEACHING MATERIAL HERE]
Please provide specific suggestions for improvement in each area.
Activity: Creating Accessibility-First Content
The Multi-Format Content Prompt
Creating visual/audio descriptions of concepts
Explain the concept of [CONCEPT] in THREE different ways for a [DEGREE AND LEVEL]:
- A verbal explanation suitable for a podcast or audio recording
(no references to visual elements, vivid descriptive language)
- A description of a diagram or visual that could illustrate this concept,
suitable for a non-specialist illustrator
- A worked example showing the concept applied to a real-world scenario
relevant to [discipline/context]
🔗 Iterative Prompting for Inclusive Content
How to use this: Copy and run each prompt in order in the same conversation thread. Each step refines the output before moving to the next.
⚙️ STEP: Set the Context (Run Once at the Start of Your Session)
This primes the AI with its role and standards for the entire conversation. Run this first, before any content request.
For this entire conversation, you are an expert higher education learning
designer. You have deep knowledge of:
- Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Guidelines 3.0 (CAST)
- WCAG 2.1 AA digital accessibility standards
- The UK Equality Act 2010 anticipatory duty for education providers
- Culturally responsive and linguistically inclusive pedagogy for
international and EAL students in UK higher education
Your job is to help me create teaching materials that are inclusive and
accessible for ALL students from the outset : including students with
disabilities, neurodivergent students, EAL/international students, and
students from diverse cultural backgrounds. No student should need to
disclose a need to access the materials you help me produce.
You will work with me step by step. At each step, wait for my confirmation
or feedback before proceeding. Do not combine steps unless I ask you to.
Confirm you understand by summarising your role in 2–3 sentences.
✏️ STEP: Define the Material
Tell the AI what you are creating and who it is for.
I want to create the following teaching material:
- Material type: [e.g. lecture notes / seminar activity / assessment
brief / reading guide / module handbook section / slide script]
- Topic: [e.g. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods]
- Level: [e.g. Level 5 undergraduate / postgraduate taught]
- Subject discipline: [e.g. Sociology / Engineering / Nursing]
- Learning Outcomes: [e.g. "By the end of this material, students should be able to..."]
- Approximate length: [e.g. 800 words / 2 sides of A4 / 10-minute read]
- Any specific cohort context: [e.g. large international cohort; online delivery only]
Before writing anything, please confirm to me:
- The material type and topic you will create
- Any accessibility or cultural considerations you are flagging
for this specific combination of discipline and cohort
- Any assumptions you are making that I should check
Wait for my go-ahead before drafting.
✏️ STEP: Draft the Structure First
Get the skeleton approved before any writing begins. This prevents long rewrites.
Now please draft the STRUCTURE ONLY for this material : headings,
sub-sections, and a one-sentence description of what each section will
contain. Do not write the full content yet.
The structure must include:
- An opening "What this covers" summary (1–2 sentences)
- A "By the end of this, you will be able to..." learning intention
- An estimated reading/completion time
- A "Key terms" section placeholder
- Clear H1/H2/H3 heading hierarchy (no skipped levels)
- A closing "Check your understanding" formative question placeholder
- An "Accessibility & Inclusion Notes" placeholder at the end
(for educator use, not for students)
Show me the structure as a numbered outline.
I will approve, adjust, or add to it before you write the content.
✏️ STEP: Draft the Content (Section by Section)
Write one section at a time so each can be reviewed before moving on.
Great. Now please write [SECTION NAME / NUMBER] only.
As you write this section, apply ALL of the following automatically
: do not wait to be asked:
LANGUAGE
□ Plain English, Grade 8–10 reading level
□ Sentences of 15–20 words maximum where possible
□ Active voice throughout
□ All technical terms defined on first use
□ No idioms, colloquialisms, or culturally specific phrases
(flag any you are unsure about in [square brackets] for me to review)
□ No Latin abbreviations (use plain English equivalents)
□ Spell out all acronyms on first use
□ No double negatives
CULTURAL INCLUSIVITY
□ Examples drawn from a range of cultural contexts : not only UK/US
□ Names in examples are culturally diverse
□ Any concept that is understood differently across academic cultures
is briefly acknowledged (e.g. "In some academic traditions...")
□ No assumed familiarity with British institutions, norms, or references
NEURODIVERSITY & COGNITIVE LOAD
□ Maximum 3–4 key concepts per section
□ Explicit signposting at the start: "In this section you will..."
□ A brief "In a nutshell" summary box at the end of the section
□ Instructions written as numbered steps, not embedded in paragraphs
VISUAL & SENSORY
□ No information conveyed through colour alone
□ Any table or diagram described in full in the surrounding text
□ Bold used for emphasis (not underlining or italics alone)
After writing the section, pause and ask me:
"Shall I continue to the next section, or would you like to
revise anything here first?"
✏️ STEP: EAL & Scaffolding Layer
Once the core content is drafted, add the EAL-support layer.
Now that the main content is drafted, please add an EAL and scaffolding
support layer. This should sit at the END of the document as a separate
section titled "Additional Learning Support" : it is available to all
students equally and requires no disclosure.
Please add:
- KEY TERMS GLOSSARY
- Define every technical or discipline-specific term used in the
document in plain English (2–3 sentences each)
- For any term that may have a different meaning in everyday English
vs. academic English, note both (e.g. "Critical: in everyday
English this often means negative. In academic writing, it means
carefully evaluating evidence and argument.")
- Flag any terms that carry different meanings across cultures
or academic traditions
- SENTENCE STARTERS & STRUCTURE FRAMES
- Provide 4–6 sentence starters relevant to the task or topic
(e.g. "One reason that... is..." / "This evidence suggests...")
- Provide one structural scaffold: a skeleton outline students
can fill in (especially useful for EAL students approaching
unfamiliar academic writing conventions)
- WORKED EXAMPLE (if applicable)
- A short annotated example showing what a strong response or
piece of analysis looks like
- Annotations should name what the student is doing
(e.g. "[This sentence makes a claim] [This sentence provides
evidence] [This sentence explains the link]")
- ALTERNATIVE ENGAGEMENT OPTIONS
- Suggest how a student could engage with the same content
in a different way (e.g. "If you prefer, you could discuss
these ideas with a peer before writing" / "You may find it
helpful to draw a mind map of the key concepts first")
✏️ STEP: Final Accessibility & Inclusion Audit
Open a new session to audit the final assessment draft
Please run a full accessibility and inclusion audit on the teaching
material attached
Return the audit as a structured table. For each item mark it:
✅ Met | ⚠️ Partially met : explain briefly | ❌ Not met : explain + give a specific fix
Do not skip any item. If you cannot assess an item from the text
alone (e.g. colour contrast), flag it with 🔍 Needs manual check. Suggest any improvements if needed.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: LANGUAGE & READABILITY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ Reading level is approximately Grade 8–10
(flag any passages that significantly exceed this)
□ All acronyms and technical/discipline-specific terms are defined
on first use
□ No idioms, colloquialisms, or figurative language remain without
a plain English explanation alongside
□ Active voice is used throughout : any passive voice that adds
ambiguity is flagged with a suggested rewrite
□ Sentences average 15–20 words : any sentence over 35 words is
flagged with a suggested split
□ No Latin abbreviations used without explanation
(e.g. "i.e.", "e.g.", "et al.", "ibid." : flag any that remain)
□ No double negatives
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: STRUCTURE & NAVIGATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ Clear heading hierarchy is used and no levels are skipped
(H1 → H2 → H3)
□ A "What this document covers" summary is present at the top
□ A learning intention statement is present
("By the end of this, you will be able to...")
□ Estimated reading or completion time is stated at the top
□ Paragraphs are 3–5 sentences maximum
□ Lists are used for 3 or more sequential or parallel items
(not buried in prose)
□ Each major section ends with a brief summary or
"In a nutshell" statement
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: CULTURAL INCLUSIVITY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ Examples, scenarios, and case studies represent a range of
cultural and geographic contexts : not defaulting to UK/US/
Western European perspectives only
□ Names used in examples are culturally diverse
□ No unexplained references to UK-specific institutions, laws,
cultural events, media, food, or social norms
□ Where academic conventions vary across cultures (e.g. critical
thinking, argument structure, citation practices, seminar
participation), these are explicitly explained rather than assumed
□ No terms are used that carry significantly different or
potentially problematic meanings in other cultural or
linguistic contexts : flag any that could cause confusion
□ Gendered generics avoided : "they/them" used as singular pronoun;
"students" used rather than gendered collective terms
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: EAL STUDENT SUPPORT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ A key terms glossary is present (covering both technical terms
and any assessment/academic convention terms used)
□ Sentence starters or structural frames are provided where
students are asked to produce written work
□ A worked example or annotated model is present or signposted
□ No phrases remain that rely on assumed cultural fluency
(flag any that could disadvantage EAL readers)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: COGNITIVE ACCESSIBILITY & NEURODIVERSITY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ Content is chunked : no single section introduces more than
3–4 new concepts without a consolidation point
□ All instructions are written as explicit, numbered steps :
nothing requires inference about what to do
□ Expectations are fully stated : no reliance on students
knowing "unwritten rules"
□ At least one formative self-check question is included
per major section
□ Where memory load is high, a worked example precedes
any independent task
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: VISUAL & SENSORY ACCESSIBILITY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ No information is conveyed through colour alone : any
colour coding is also accompanied by text labels, symbols,
or patterns
□ All tables have a plain text summary below them describing
what the table shows and its key finding
□ All images or diagrams are described fully in the surrounding text
□ Bold is used for emphasis : not underlining (reserved for
hyperlinks only) and not italics alone for critical information
□ A dyslexia-friendly formatting note is included, recommending:
Arial, Calibri or OpenDyslexic, size 12–14pt, 1.5 line spacing,
left-aligned text
□ 🔍 Colour contrast between text and background should be checked
manually against WCAG 2.1 AA standard (4.5:1 ratio minimum)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SECTION: MULTIPLE MEANS OF ENGAGEMENT
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
□ At least two different ways of engaging with the content
are offered or suggested (e.g. reading + audio, solo +
paired, written + spoken)
□ At least one extension or deeper-dive suggestion is included
for students who want to go further
□ Where applicable, note is made that alternative formats
(audio, video, large print) are or could be available
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
FINAL SUMMARY
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
After completing the checklist, provide:
- TOP PRIORITY FIXES : the three changes that would have
the greatest positive impact on accessibility and inclusion,
with a specific suggested rewrite or addition for each
- WHAT IS WORKING WELL : two or three specific strengths
to preserve in any revision
- MANUAL CHECKS NEEDED : a list of items flagged 🔍 that
require human review outside this tool
[upload your teaching material]
🧠 Supporting Neurodiverse Students and Students with Hidden Disabilities
Neurodiverse students : including those with dyslexia, ADHD, autism spectrum, dyscalculia, and others : make up a significant proportion of university cohorts. Many have not been formally assessed or do not disclose their needs.
Inclusive-by-design means your materials work for them by default, not by exception.
GenAI can help you proactively design content that reduces cognitive load, provides clearer structure, and offers multiple entry points. This benefits not only neurodiverse students but all learners : cognitive load reduction and clear structure are universal gains.
Reducing Cognitive Load
Prompt Bank: Neurodiversity and Disability Support
Reducing cognitive load in written materials
Rewrite the following content to reduce cognitive load for a student
with dyslexia or ADHD. Apply these specific strategies:
- Break long paragraphs into shorter ones (max 4 sentences)
- Add clear sub-headings every 3-4 paragraphs
- Use numbered steps for any process or sequence
- Bold the single most important idea per section
- Move background context to a separate "Further Reading" section
so the core content is uncluttered
- Replace passive voice with active voice throughout
[PASTE YOUR CONTENT HERE]
Writing content advisories
The University of Glasgow's Inclusive Learning guidance asks staff to consider content advice for challenging material, enabling students to prepare in advance and seek support where needed.
Write a brief content advisory (max 80 words) for a lecture or reading
that covers [TOPIC].
The advisory should:
- Clearly state what challenging content will appear and where
- Be written in neutral, non-sensationalising language
- Affirm the educational value of engaging with the material
- Signpost relevant student support services without being prescriptive
- Not discourage engagement : frame preparation, not avoidance
Example Content Advisory
Content Advisory: This session includes a case study involving workplace discrimination and discussion of mental health in organisational contexts. You may wish to review the session materials in advance (available on Moodle). Student wellbeing support is available through the University Counselling Service. The educational purpose of this content is to apply theoretical frameworks to real institutional challenges.
Creating structured note templates
Create a structured note-taking template for a lecture on [TOPIC].
The template should:
- Mirror the structure of the lecture (provide the lecture outline/headings)
- Include space for key definitions, main arguments, and examples
- Include a "Questions I have" box per section
- Include a "Links to other modules/concepts" box
- Use clear visual hierarchy (headings, sub-headings, ruled boxes)
- Be screen reader compatible (no merged cells, clear heading order)
This will be shared with all students as a lecture companion document.
Audio and podcast scripts
Convert the following lecture notes into a script for a 5-minute
audio summary. The script should:
- Be written to be listened to, not read (shorter sentences, no complex syntax)
- Signpost structure verbally ("First... second... finally...")
- Not reference any visual elements
- Define all technical terms the first time they appear
- End with three key takeaways stated clearly
[PASTE YOUR LECTURE NOTES HERE]
🔧 Practice Activity: Structured Support
Create a note-taking template for your next lecture using the prompt above. Distribute it to all students at the start of the session.
Reflection:
What does providing structured notes tell students about how you value their diverse learning needs?
Does providing this scaffold reduce the challenge of the intellectual content?
Universal Supports That Benefit Everyone
Design features that support neurodiverse students while benefiting all learners
Design Feature
How It Helps Neurodiverse Students
How It Benefits All Students
GenAI Prompt Support
Clear headings and structure
Reduces working memory load, improves navigation
Easier to find information, better for review
"Add clear headings every 3-4 paragraphs"
Numbered steps and checklists
Supports executive function, reduces anxiety
Clearer instructions, less confusion
"Convert this into numbered steps"
Key terms defined immediately
Reduces cognitive load from unfamiliar vocabulary
Better comprehension for all backgrounds
"Define technical terms in brackets when first used"
Multiple ways to access content
Accommodates different processing preferences
More flexible study options
"Create three versions: visual, audio, and text"
📋 Inclusive Assessment Design with GenAI
Assessment should measure learning, not language proficiency or cultural familiarity. Inclusive assessment design ensures all students can demonstrate their knowledge and skills fairly, regardless of their background.
GenAI can help you create assessments that are clear, fair, and culturally sensitive while maintaining academic rigour.
🎯 Key UDL Assessment Strategies
Multiple Expression Options: Allow choice in how students demonstrate knowledge (written, oral, visual, multimedia)
Clear Success Criteria: Provide explicit rubrics and exemplars so students understand expectations
Scaffolded Support: Include templates, sentence starters, and planning frameworks
Cultural Responsiveness: Allow diverse examples and perspectives while maintaining academic standards
Accessible Language: Use clear, concrete language and define technical terms
Activity: Write an Accessible Assessment Brief
Use this 5-step iterative prompt chain to create an assessment brief that builds inclusion into the design from the start. Each step requires your approval before moving to the next. This prevents the "retrofit" approach and ensures accessibility is considered throughout the design process.
🎯 STEP A: Prime the AI (Do this once per session)
You are an expert in inclusive assessment design with deep knowledge of UDL principles, accessibility requirements, and cultural responsiveness.
Your role is to help me re-design an assessment that:
- Measures learning, not language proficiency or cultural familiarity
- Provides multiple ways for students to demonstrate knowledge
- Uses clear, accessible language and instructions
- Removes unnecessary barriers while maintaining academic rigour
- Considers the diverse backgrounds and needs of my student cohort
You excel at identifying potential barriers before they become problems and suggesting practical alternatives. You always ask for my approval before moving to the next step.
Please confirm you understand this role.
Wait for AI confirmation before proceeding to Step B
🎯 STEP B: Define Your Assessment Context
I need to create an assessment for:
Module/Subject: [e.g., Introduction to Psychology, Ethics, etc. Best if you add the specific topic or focus of the assessment too]
Learning outcomes being assessed: [list 2-3 key outcomes]
Student cohort: [e.g., First-year undergraduate, mixed international and domestic students, 120 students]
Assessment weighting: [e.g., 40% of final grade]
Submission format: [e.g., written report, presentation, portfolio]
Word count/time limit: [be specific]
Any specific requirements: [e.g., must include case study analysis, peer review component]
Current assessment brief: [if you have an existing brief, paste it here for the GenAI tool to review. If not, just describe the assessment task as you currently envision it]
Known diversity considerations:
- Percentage of EAL students: [if known]
- Common accessibility needs in your cohort: [e.g., extended time, alternative formats]
- Cultural backgrounds to consider: [if known]
- Any other relevant factors: [mature students, part-time, etc.]
Please review this brief and flag any potential barriers or missing information before we proceed to design the structure.
Review AI feedback and confirm you're ready for Step C
🎯 STEP C: Create Assessment Structure
Based on the assessment brief I provided, create a detailed structure that includes:
- Assessment format and components (with clear weighting if multi-part)
- Detailed task instructions written in accessible language
- Success criteria that students can easily understand and self-assess against
- Submission guidelines (format, length, referencing requirements)
- Key dates and milestones (if applicable)
Ensure the structure:
- Uses clear, concrete language (avoid abstract terms)
- Provides choice where possible (topics, formats, examples)
- Includes scaffolding opportunities (drafts, feedback points, resources)
- Has explicit success criteria rather than vague descriptors
- Considers different cultural contexts and academic backgrounds
Present this as a numbered outline for my approval. Don't write full content yet - just the structure.
Review the structural outline and approve before moving to Step D
🎯 STEP D: Develop Complete Assessment Brief
Now write the complete assessment brief based on the approved structure.
Include:
- Clear task overview with context and rationale
- Step-by-step instructions written in accessible language
- Detailed success criteria/marking rubric with specific descriptors
- Support resources (templates, examples, guidance documents)
- Submission requirements and formatting guidelines
- Timeline with key milestones (if multi-part assessment)
Writing guidelines:
- Use active voice and clear, direct language
- Define technical terms (or provide glossary)
- Use bullet points and numbering for complex instructions
- Include worked examples or templates where helpful
- Provide multiple pathways to demonstrate learning
- Consider different academic writing traditions and referencing styles
Focus on one section at a time and wait for my feedback before continuing.
Work through each section with AI, providing feedback before moving on
🎯 STEP E: Add EAL and Accessibility Supports
Review the complete assessment brief and add enhanced supports for EAL students and accessibility needs:
EAL Support Layer:
- Create a glossary of key terms with plain English definitions
- Provide sentence starters for common academic writing tasks
- Identify and explain any idioms, colloquialisms, or culturally specific references
- Offer alternative ways to phrase complex instructions
- Include academic writing templates/frameworks
Accessibility Enhancements:
- Add estimated reading/completion times
- Provide structure overview (roadmap of the assessment)
- Include self-check questions or progress indicators
- Offer alternative demonstration methods where possible
- Add formatting guidelines for accessibility (fonts, spacing, headings)
Cultural Responsiveness:
- Note where examples can be drawn from different cultural contexts
- Acknowledge different academic traditions and approaches
- Provide guidance for citing non-English sources where relevant
Present these additions as clearly marked "support sections" that can be easily located by students who need them.
Review all additions and make final adjustments
Activity: Generate an Explicit, Inclusive Rubric
Why this matters
Explicit rubrics reduce student anxiety, support self-regulated learning, and are particularly powerful for EAL and neurodivergent students who may not have access to the tacit cultural knowledge that helps other students infer what markers want. Research shows explicit criteria can positively affect student performance and reduce anxiety when shared proactively. Crucially, a rubric that is clear for students is also fairer and more consistent for markers.
The Iterative Prompt Chain
STEP A - Draft the Rubric Structure
I want to create an explicit, student-facing marking rubric for the
assessment brief below.
First, help me identify the right criteria. Based on the learning
outcomes in the brief, suggest 4-6 marking criteria that:
- Directly map to the stated learning outcomes
(not to surface features like formatting or word count)
- Can be assessed consistently by different markers
- Do not privilege any particular cultural background or writing
tradition over another
- Distinguish between the quality of thinking and the quality of
expression (these should be separate criteria where possible,
especially to support EAL students)
- Avoid criterion names that rely on tacit knowledge
(e.g. replace "academic voice" with "use of appropriate academic
language and conventions, as described below")
Present as a table. Then wait for my approval before building
the full rubric.
STEP B - Build the Full Rubric
Now build the full rubric using the criteria we agreed.
Use the 22-point grade scale below to create 4 performance levels for each criterion:
- Excellent (equivalent to 22-18 points)
- Very Good (equivalent to 17-15 points)
- Satisfactory (equivalent to 14-10 points)
- Not Satisfactory (below 10)
For each cell in the rubric, write 2-3 sentences that:
[] Describe what the work LOOKS LIKE at this level
(not just what is missing - describe the positive characteristics
at every level)
[] Use concrete, observable language
(e.g. "The argument is clearly stated in the introduction and
consistently developed across all sections" not "argument is good")
[] Avoid evaluative adjectives without definition
(e.g. replace "sophisticated" with "draws on multiple theoretical
perspectives and explains how they interact")
[] Use language that is accessible to a student reading at
Grade 8-10 level
After building the rubric, add a plain-English "How to use this
rubric" guide for students (maximum 150 words).
Audit Your Rubric
Open a new session to review your rubric.
Run an equity check on the rubric attached/pasted below.
Review each criterion and each performance level descriptor against
these questions:
[] Does any criterion inadvertently favour students from particular
cultural or linguistic backgrounds?
(e.g. does "academic voice" implicitly mean "British academic
writing conventions"? If so, rewrite to be explicit about what
is expected and why.)
[] Does the rubric separate language/expression from content/
thinking? If not, add a note to markers about how to weight
these appropriately for EAL students.
[] Is any criterion assessing something that could be a disability-
related barrier rather than a learning outcome?
(e.g. "writes clearly and concisely" may disadvantage dyslexic
students if it is a separate criterion unconnected to an LO)
[] Are the performance descriptors written so that every level
describes what IS present - not just what is absent?
(Rubrics that only describe failure at lower levels are demotivating
and less useful for formative self-assessment.)
Return a short report: one paragraph per criterion noting any
equity concerns and suggesting any rewrites needed.